Cardinal Ratzinger, who became Pope Benedict XVI in 2005
and served through 2013, wrote a blistering letter in 2004 forbidding Catholics
from voting for pro-abortion Hillary Clinton or anyone who espouses her ideas.
The
letter reads:
The Church teaches that abortion or euthanasia is a grave sin. The Encyclical Letter Evangelium vitae, with reference to judicial decisions or civil laws that authorize or promote abortion or euthanasia, states that there is a “grave and clear obligation to oppose them by conscientious objection. […]
The Church teaches that abortion or euthanasia is a grave sin. The Encyclical Letter Evangelium vitae, with reference to judicial decisions or civil laws that authorize or promote abortion or euthanasia, states that there is a “grave and clear obligation to oppose them by conscientious objection. […]
In the case of an intrinsically
unjust law, such as a law permitting abortion or euthanasia, it is therefore
never licit to obey it, or to ‘take part in a propaganda campaign in favour of
such a law or vote for it’” (no. 73).
Christians have a “grave obligation
of conscience not to cooperate formally in practices which, even if permitted
by civil legislation, are contrary to God’s law. Indeed, from the moral
standpoint, it is never licit to cooperate formally in evil. […]
This cooperation can never be
justified either by invoking respect for the freedom of others or by appealing
to the fact that civil law permits it or requires it” (no. 74).
Cardinal Ratzinger reinforces his opinion in the footnote:
[N.B. A Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in evil, and so unworthy to present himself for Holy Communion, if he were to deliberately vote for a candidate precisely because of the candidate’s permissive stand on abortion and/or euthanasia.
[N.B. A Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in evil, and so unworthy to present himself for Holy Communion, if he were to deliberately vote for a candidate precisely because of the candidate’s permissive stand on abortion and/or euthanasia.
When a Catholic does not share a
candidate’s stand in favour of abortion and/or euthanasia, but votes for that
candidate for other reasons, it is considered remote material cooperation,
which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons.]
Fr. Jay Scott Newman reinforced Cardinal Ratzinger’s
letter in 2008:
Voting for a pro-abortion politician when a plausible pro-life alternative exists constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil, and those Catholics who do so place themselves outside of the full communion of Christ’s Church and under the judgment of divine law.
And Father John Lankeit’s homily leaves no doubt.
Voting for a pro-abortion politician when a plausible pro-life alternative exists constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil, and those Catholics who do so place themselves outside of the full communion of Christ’s Church and under the judgment of divine law.
And Father John Lankeit’s homily leaves no doubt.
All six paragraphs
of the letter plus half of the footnote make it clear that Catholics who
support abortion by voting for pro-abortion candidates are cooperating in evil
and may not receive Communion.
RELATED POSTS:
5 Horrors Hillary
Clinton Could Bring Upon America
http://www.presidentialvoting2016.com/pope-francis-forbidss-catholics-from-voting-for-hillary/
No comments:
Post a Comment