Inaccurate War Films
Truly
Inaccurate War Films To Hit The Big Screen
Jack
When
sitting down to watch war movies, most audiences expect that the accounts are
as true to what actually happened as possible, especially since they are based
on a real, historical event.
However,
many of the war portrayals aren’t as accurate as you’d expect. Movie directors
have to cut out pieces of story as well as embellish what really happened to
make it more exciting or enticing for audiences.
Here are some of those movies which haven’t portrayed the
events of war as accurately as they could have.
1. Enemy at the Gates (2001)
Set
at the Eastern Front line during World War Two, Enemy at the Gates focuses on
telling the story of Vasily Zaytsev, a famous Soviet sniper who fought at the
Battle of Stalingrad.
Its
most inaccurate scenes include showing the Red Army soldiers heading into
battle with just one weapon between two men.
While
records show the Red Army suffered with a lack of arms, there is no evidence to
suggest that any soldier was sent into combat without a weapon.
The movie also suggests that due to Vasily’s actions he
actually single-handedly changed the course of the battle. However over a
million men fought for both the Nazis and the Red Army.
Then
the key scene when Vasily engages in a direct one-on-one sniper fight with his
Nazi rival may not have even occurred.
Vasily claimed in his memoirs that the fight happened, but
no other records or reports of the fight exist.
2. Jarhead (2005)
Awarding-winning
movie, Jarhead, was a psychological thriller telling the story of US soldiers
who took part in the first Gulf War in the early 1990s.
Veterans
say that the movie exaggerates what actually happened and that scenes such as
soldiers firing wildly into the air around a bonfire, being abandoned on the
battlefield and the accidental killing of a soldier during an exercise would
have been unlikely.
Also physical and mental abuse portrayed in the movie has
not been shown accurately. The official Marine Corps Public Affairs
spokesperson has said the movie is inaccurate.
3. The Battle of the Bulge (1965)
The
famous movie used American M47 Patton tanks on the German side to replace the
Nazi King Tiger tank.
The
weather conditions were also inaccurate as the battle was famously hindered by
atrocious winter weather conditions, yet many battle scenes are completely free
of snow and rain.
They
also occur on flat terrain, which again was not the case in the Ardennes
forest.
The film portrays the US tanks running the German tanks
down so that they ran out of fuel, but this didn’t happen and the German tanks
would have run out regardless.
Plus
all of the American jeeps in the movie were post-war designs.
4. Red Tails (2012)
More
recently, Red Tails tried to be more upbeat than the standard war movie and
tells the story of the first US military African American fighter squadron, who
became known as the Tuskegee Airmen.
Some of the points made in the film weren’t true, such as
the assumption that they didn’t suffer any losses under enemy fire. However,
the truth is that over 25 of their bombers were shot down throughout World War
Two.
One of the movie’s main characters was portrayed as one of
the best fighter pilots in combat during the war.
However,
records show that the squadron didn’t have any flying aces.
5. U-571 (2000)
U-571
is a classic American movie that portrays the country as the sole victor during
World War Two and downplays the role of the other Allied forces.
The movie portrays the capture of the first Nazi Enigma
machine that the Nazis were using to communicate coded messages and send
military plans and instructions to its forces.
It
shows the operation as a US-led mission, but in reality the mission was
undertaken by the British Royal Navy.
In fact, the real-life mission happened in 1941 around
seven months before America even joined the war.
US forces did capture a later Enigma machine, but that occurred later in 1944.
US forces did capture a later Enigma machine, but that occurred later in 1944.
When the movie was released in 2000, the British Prime
Minister at the time, Tony Blair, denounced it as an insult to the British
Royal Navy.
6. Flyboys (2006)
The
German red Fokker Dr 1s in the movie, Flyboys, was used as standard issue of
the Luftwaffe. However, in reality the aircraft was not commonly used.
US
Army Air Force pilots are also shown flying Nieuport 17s, but this was
decommissioned long before the Germans were flying the Fokker.
The movie’s producers said that the decision had been made
so that audiences would be able to tell the two aircraft apart.
It
emerged that one of the military advisers on the movie turned out to be a
criminal and was later charged with fraud, including making up his military
service record.
7. Windtalkers (2002)
This
movie depicts the story of the Native American Navajo Indians, who were engaged
during World War Two so that coded messages could be sent in the Navajo
language.
One of the main story lines in the movie suggests that the
Navajo Indians had bodyguards who were told to kill them if they got into enemy
hands but this was incorrect.
Ground battle scenes were also not accurately depicted
since they occurred at around 10 feet apart, which wasn’t usually the case,
plus there was no cover fire or concealing when the troops advanced.
8. Pearl Harbor (2001)
Although
a modern war time epic, the movie has many inaccuracies.
In Pearl Harbor, Ben Affleck’s character joins the Eagle
Squadron.
However,
active-duty members of the U.S. Air Force weren’t allowed to join this
squadron; civilians, though, were able to do so by becoming members of the
Royal Air Force, or RAF.
In
an even further error, the filmmakers chose to adorn Affleck’s Spitfire plane
with “RF”, the insignia of the N. 303 Polish Fighter Squadron, although he was
flying a British plane.
One of the most obvious and crucial errors in the film is
seen when Admiral Kimmel is notified that an enemy submarine was under attack.
During
the actual events that took place at Pearl Harbor, Kimmel wasn’t notified until
hours after the attack ended.
He
instead heard of what was taking place only once the Japanese bombs had already
fallen into the harbor.
One specific scene shows a soldier firing at a Japanese
fighter plane which is flying between two battleships, but this would have been
impossible since he would have been firing at his own vessel.
Plus
in some scenes one canister of ammunition is being used, whilst in others there
are two.
9. The Green Berets (1968)
A
Vietnam War movie, The Green Berets, features John Wayne and was made to try to
convince the American people that the Vietnam War was a worthy war.
However, John Wayne sometimes held his rifle the wrong way
up, was aging and was overweight. In reality there is no way he would have been
allowed out in the field in the real army.
The native jungle terrain was replaced with pine trees and
the earth was a red clay, which is not from Vietnam.
It was resoundingly panned by critics who said that it
made a mockery of the real Vietnam War.
10. The Hurt Locker (2008)
Set
during the second Iraq War, The Hurt Locker follows a bomb disposal squad and
the drama is over the top compared to reality.
One scene where one of the men is said to have disposed of
870 bombs over his career is said to be unrealistic.
The
same character was also panned for risking his men’s lives by not following
procedure.
The
squad often operate without support which again is unlikely and the
relationship between the men and their officer shows disrespect, which wouldn’t
be the case in a real-life situation.
RELATED POSTS:
CLICK HERE . . .
CLICK HERE . . .
CLICK HERE . . .
CLICK HERE . . .
CLICK HERE . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment