What the rock in Matthew 16:18 is
The debate
rages over whether “the rock” on which Christ will build His church is Peter, or
Peter’s confession that Jesus is “the Christ, the Son of the Living God” (Matthew 16:16).
The grammatical construction allows for either
view.
The first view is that Jesus was declaring that
Peter would be the “rock” on which He would build His church.
Jesus appears
to be using a play on words. “You are Peter (petros) and on this rock
(petra) I will build my church.”
Since Peter’s name means “rock,” and Jesus is
going to build His church on a rock – it appears that Christ is linking the two
together.
God used Peter greatly in the foundation of the
church. It was Peter who first proclaimed the Gospel on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:14-47).
Peter was also the first to take the Gospel to
the Gentiles (Acts 10:1-48).
In a sense, Peter was the rock “foundation”
of the church.
The other
popular interpretation of the rock is that Jesus was referring not to Peter,
but to Peter’s confession of faith in verse 16: “You are the Christ, the son of
the living God.”
Jesus had never explicitly taught Peter and the
other disciples the fullness of His identity, and He recognized that God had
sovereignly opened Peter’s eyes and revealed to him who Jesus really was.
His confession of Christ as Messiah poured forth
from him, a heartfelt declaration of Peter’s personal faith in Jesus.
It is this personal faith in Christ which is the
hallmark of the true Christian.
Those who have placed their faith in Christ, as
Peter did, comprise the Church – the “Ekklesia”
– the “called-out” ones.
Peter
expresses this in 1 Peter 2:4 when
he addressed the believers who had been dispersed around the ancient world: “Coming
to Him as to a living stone, rejected indeed by men, but chosen by God and
precious, you also, as living stones, are being built up a spiritual house, a
holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through
Jesus Christ.”
At this point, Jesus declares that God had
revealed this truth to Peter.
The word for Peter, “Petros,” means a small
stone (John 1:42).
Jesus used a
play on words here with “petra” (“on this rock”) which means
a foundation boulder, as in Matthew 7:24-25 when
He described the rock upon which the wise man builds his house.
Peter himself uses the same imagery in his first
epistle: the Church is built of numerous small “petros”- “living stones” (1 Peter 2:5).
They, like Peter, confess that Jesus is the
Christ, the Son of the living God, and those confessions of faith are the
bedrock of the Church.
In addition, the New Testament makes it
abundantly clear that
- Christ is
both the foundation (Acts 4:11, 12; 1 Corinthians
3:11) and
- the head
of the Church (Ephesians 5:23).
It is a mistake to think that here He is giving
either of those roles to Peter.
There is a sense in which the apostles played a
foundational role in the building of the church (Ephesians 2:20).
But the role of primacy is reserved for Christ
alone, not assigned to Peter.
So, Jesus’ words here are best interpreted as a
simple play on words in that a boulder-like truth came from the mouth of one
who was called a small stone.
And Christ
Himself is called the “chief cornerstone” (1 Peter 2:6, 7).
The chief cornerstone of any building was that
upon which the building was anchored.
If Christ declared Himself to be the cornerstone,
how could Peter be the rock upon which the church was built?
It is more
likely that the believers, of which Peter is one, are the stones which make up
the church, anchored upon the Cornerstone, “and he who believes on Him will by no means
be put to shame” (1 Peter 2:6).
The Roman Catholic Church uses the argument that
Peter is the rock to which Jesus referred as evidence that it is the one true
church.
As we have seen, Peter's being the rock is not
the only valid interpretation of this verse.
Even if Peter is the rock in Matthew 16:18, this is meaningless in
giving the Roman Catholic Church any authority.
Scripture nowhere records Peter being in Rome.
Scripture nowhere describes Peter as being
supreme over the other apostles.
The New Testament does not describe Peter as
being the “all authoritative leader”
of the early Christian church.
Peter was not the first pope, and Peter did not
start the Roman Catholic Church.
The origin of the Roman Catholic Church is not in the teachings of Peter or
any other apostle.
If Peter truly was the founder of the Roman
Catholic Church, it would be in full agreement with what Peter taught (Acts chapter
2, 1 Peter, 2 Peter).
No comments:
Post a Comment